

I see Bachmann`s forthcoming class 168/2 as a positive step forward. Unfortunately, I have no use for such a unit. However, it`s good to see that they are looking at multiple units other than Turbostars.
Their recent 168/1 Clubmans may seem to have been an unusual choice when you consider that there are only 8 such units, but without counting too many rivets, they do look very similar, if not identical to the Turbostar (although some do sport different light clusters.) So yes, Bachmann have filled a gap here.

'Clubman' 168110 is seen passing through Bishops Itchington, Warwickshire, earlier this year. This is the unit which is now available from Bachmann.

When I first heard of the models release, I thought that one of these units would be ideal for my re-opened link to Banbury. First generation units would be used for earlier timescales. However, the more I thought about it, a class 165/0 Network Turbo (as pictured above) would make a more interesting train. Firstly, because it doesn`t look like a Turbostar, and secondly because it could be in Network Southeast Livery, which some of the units still carried into 2005.

There are also a handful of three car sets, such as this one pictured at Leamington Spa. Hopefully Bachmann will add these units to their catalogue in the near future.
Should I go out and get the 168/1, or be patient and see what`s around the corner? I think I`ll hold tight for a while....
On my Stereo: Kasabian - Empire

No, not much achieved on the modelling bench this week. Instead, my free time has been spent chasing the prototype for my upcoming model of 87006! I eventually managed to get a good shot today (above) and a reasonable one (considering the awful light) yesterday as can be seen below.

However, I`m still not happy, and I need more. Besides, the more prototype pictures the better! Any excuse will do! Where can I catch her tomorrow.....?

My dislike of a certain type of train is no secret. However, one decked in 'Superman' vinyls had to be chased, and this one has been a target which I seem to miss at every opportunity. Well at least I`ve managed to catch it a few times this week. Now, how about a proper superhero next time.......
Anyway, enough waffling for now, I have the latest Model Rail to peruse. Looks like it may be interesting this month, particularly the article on FFA/FGA flats, something I intend to cover sometime in the future, when I`ve got some spare time and aren`t gadding about taking photos! Until next time.....
On my Stereo: (Roger Daltry) - McVicar - The Original Soundtrack

I was very pleased to hear that 87006 was back out again on the 'driver refresher runs' between London Euston and Birmingham New Street.
On Wednesday, I went out especially to get a good photo of the train. On that day, I went to Dodford on the off chance that the train would not use the Northampton loop as was originally scheduled. (This was based on a lesson I thought I had learned during the original 'refreshers' back in May. Alas, my luck was out on this occasion. On Thursday, my aim was to get a lunchtime shot at Long Buckby where the train WAS scheduled to pass. However, as luck would have it, the train avoided the Northampton Loop this time!
Business to attend to in Northampton today ensured the train could not elude me! However, after finishing work, time was of the essence, and I only had time to dash over to Ashton where the lousy shot above was taken. Oh well, at least I`ve got some reference for roof detail!
I am determined to get some better shots when the train is in revenue service, so watch this space.....

Upon returning home, a short venture into the loft unearthed a couple of second hand Lima 87`s which were purchased for spares a considerable time ago. Yes, I have had this thought before, and yes, I know I still have dozens of locos awaiting cosmetic makeovers, but I thought yet again how easy it would be to model 87006. But what use for the other loco? Possibly 87022 or 87028? I shall have a little think about that tonight over a few fine ales.......
On my Stereo: Genesis - Duke

It`s been very quiet on the shopping front at Rugby Parkway of late. This is mainly due to the fact I have more than enough projects to be getting on with, amongst several other things which are not linked with railway modelling at all. If I haven`t got any time to play, then I`m not going to rush out and buy any new toys, simple as that! However, purchasing some of Bachmann's Freightliner 57`s, particularly 57010 'Freightliner Crusader' and 57011 'Freightliner Challenger' have been a real temptation.

Their first offering, 57008, was let down by incorrect positioning of the nameplates. The latest 2 releases have also received criticism from some quarters. 57011 also has issues with positioning of nameplates, and the model also features cabside freightliner logos which the locomotive has never carried. (See top photo.) 57010 has correctly positioned nameplates, but again has freightliner logos on both cabs, where the prototype (above) somehow only received these to one cab!
Yes, these little school boy errors should have been noticed and rectified before the products release, but unlike a certain class 90, I`m not going to moan this time round, I`m just too bored of moaning at the moment!
These little errors aside, these models seem top-notch. Any printed nameplates will be removed anyway prior to fitting of etched plates, and thanks to Bachmann for printing a full set of cab-side logos, the renumbering to another member of the class (excluding 57007) will be much easier!

I intend to model 57007 'Freightliner Bond' at some point in the near future. The lack of cab-side logos can clearly be seen in the photo above. However, with a little time and patience, the unwanted cabside logos should be simple enough to remove by carefully using cotton buds and enamel thinners.
Finally, I`m not sure if I`m Dr.Jekyll or Mr.Hyde today, but wouldn`t modelling be boring if everything was perfect straight out of the box?
On my Stereo: The Teardrop Explodes - Wilder

I have recently had a message from my Web-hosting company informing me that my site has been up and running for 100 weeks, just short of 2 years. How time has flown!
Although I have little interest in meaningless facts and figures, while some of my fish were counting their pellets, I thought maybe a little rivet counting was in order..... Looking through the archives for a little nostalgia, it was amazing to see what sort of facts and figures I could come up with:
Since the sites launch:
* There have been 105 OMWB entries.
* 97 motored points have been installed on the layout.
* Over 500 figures have been painted, many by my wife (Thank you)
* Hundreds of wheelsets have been replaced......
* I have spent £? (too much money!)
* Copious cups of tea have been drank.
* An even greater amount of ale has been consumed!
* An unrecorded number of minor injuries have been sustained!
* Several hundred swear words of various forms have been uttered.....
* Numerous small detail parts have been lost on the floor, resulting in hours of lost time!
* Too many things have had to be done 'all-over-again'
* More projects have been started than have actually been finished....
* The project as a whole has fallen several months behind schedule.
* I have thought on more than one occasion that I should do something else instead!

Lack of progress seems more evident than progress made, and the dozens of Hurst pantographs still to be put together is a good example of this!

Another area that is moving very slowly is the scanning of my old prints and slides. Still, I`m in no rush to get them all done, it`s just nice to add a few every once in a while as way of a change.
Above is a small collection of photos from the early 80`s, these particular ones were taken at Rugby, Cathiron and Coventry. I may get these uploaded one of these days......
Anyway, typing away at this keyboard is going to get little done, so I had better crack on!
Oh I forgot, the latest Rail Express came through the door today, so maybe I`ll just browse through that first......
On my Stereo: Future Sound of London - Lifeforms

To be honest, I think I already knew the answer before I started, but after constructing some Parkside Dundass VEA Vanwide kits, I wondered if the old Hornby versions which I`ve had boxed up for many years could be used in any form. Maybe with some extra work and detailing they could be used alongside the newly constructed Parkside models?
I had never noticed before, but the Hornby wagon is a lot shorter when compared to the more recent kit. Having done no research into what the correct dimensions are, I am unable to say which one is wrong, but I have my suspicions....... Maybe that crude underframe which has also housed fictitious 'Weetabix', 'Kit-kat', and various other child attracting wagons may have something to do with a shortened VEA?
On my Stereo: Thom Yorke - The Eraser
So, it looks like these Hornby offerings have no use for me at all, and will be erased from my collection. You`ll be able to see some of the kit-built wagons once painting is complete.

Never being afraid to experiment with 'new' gadgets, I picked up a packet of Hornby`s recent R8220 NEM Couplers to see if they would be of any use to me. Some quarters have described these couplings as 'Close couplers', probably due to the similarity to the excellent Roco close couplers which I use in great numbers. However, to be fair to Hornby, these couplers do not have any mention of 'Close coupling' on the packet, or on their website. Should these couplings be judged on how close they can couple, or should they be seen as a commendable effort in moving away from the tension lock system?
Before I go any further, these new couplings are not rebranded Roco couplings. The Hornby offering is longer in length by approximately 2mm, so when a pair is coupled, the distance between wagons or coaches would be 4mm more when Hornby couplings are used.

However, this does not automatically rule the Hornby version out. Just look at the result (above) when using Hornby couplings between Bachmann Mk1 coaches.....

And just look at how useless the Roco ones are for this purpose. They are so short that they don`t even lock together.

My next experiment involved the first wagons which came to hand, these being a couple of Bachmann MFA`s. This time round it`s role-reversal. The Hornby couplers have actually spaced the wagons further apart than if they had been linked by tension lock style couplings, so not much use here! Whereas the Roco couplers are ideally suited to this wagon as can be seen below.

My experiments will not end here, but we can already see that Roco couplings can suit better in one instance, and Hornby scores points in another.
On my Stereo: The Dining Rooms - Versioni Partiscolari
On a final note, The Hornby offerings are compatible with the traditional Roco coupler. The coupling action may not be as smooth as Roco to Roco, or Hornby to Hornby, but they join together well enough all the same.

Most of the tracklaying on the layout was done during the winter months. It was nice and cool in the loft then. However, it`s not nice and cool at the moment, and the heat has been busy wreaking havoc!
Here we can see the result of some rails expanding due to the heat. The affected area seen here is on the upper fiddle yard, so cosmetics are of no real concern. This little problem should be rectified with only a small amount of work and time, but it`s very annoying nonetheless. The sleepers in the middle of the join are dummies which were glued into place.
There are a few other sections of trackwork which have been affected, but the severity is minimal. I wonder what the outcome would have been on ballasted sections of track. Would the track be forced upwards, or would the expanding somehow be contained?

I`ve also been working on overhauling some of my AC locomotives, and finishing some wagon kits, although I don`t think the progress is interesting enough to justify regular updates. However, here we can see repainted 86233 finally nearing completion.
On my Stereo: Puddle of Mud - Come Clean
Will I get all of my projects finished before Christmas? Maybe if I get a 'month of Sundays' thrown in for good measure!

I have spent today doing a few odds and ends. About time I got round to doing some of those finishing touches, and getting round to completing a few half finished kits.....
I`ve had numerous wagon kits which have been in limbo for many months now. Uncomplete wagons included some Turbots, Rudd, Clams, OBA`s and some VEA`s. I also had some ZKA 'Limpets' earmarked for conversion, but it will now be a lot easier to simply wait for the Bachmann release!
Unfortunately, I`ve been unable to take the OBA wagons any further as they seem to be winning at the game of hide and seek! A job for another rainy day then!

I`m also slowly working through my locomotive refurbishment programme, albeit running about 3 months behind schedule. Here we can see some 86`s which are receiving bufferbeam improvements.
On my Stereo: Placebo - Meds